Vulnerability Fix: Prevent incorrect method alias when method name not found in function name#342
Open
kuanlu95 wants to merge 1 commit intoevanw:masterfrom
Open
Vulnerability Fix: Prevent incorrect method alias when method name not found in function name#342kuanlu95 wants to merge 1 commit intoevanw:masterfrom
kuanlu95 wants to merge 1 commit intoevanw:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a logic bug in CallSiteToString() where a suffix comparison using indexOf may return -1, which can cause incorrect [as methodName] aliases to be appended.
For example, when functionName = "doSomething" and methodName = "customMethod", the current logic evaluates -1 != 4 and appends an alias even though the method name is not present.
This change ensures indexOf returns a valid position before comparing suffix. Alternatively, String.prototype.endsWith() is used for clarity where supported.